Nursing Home Staffing Profile — 2025Q3
How Louisiana's 256 facilities grade out
Where facilities fall across the staffing spectrum
For-profit facilities consistently staff lower than non-profit and government-run homes
Top 5 by total nurse HPRD
Bottom 5 by total nurse HPRD
Pick any two Louisiana nursing homes and see how they stack up across every metric
Staffing metrics by county in Louisiana — click a county to see individual facilities
| County | Facilities ↓ | Avg HPRD | RN HPRD | Meet Benchmark | Grades |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸E. Baton Rouge | 24 | 3.94 | 0.33 | 75.0% | Mostly F |
| ▸Caddo | 21 | 4.07 | 0.44 | 61.9% | Mixed F/D |
| ▸Jefferson | 12 | 4.17 | 0.68 | 41.7% | Mostly F |
| ▸Orleans | 11 | 3.89 | 0.25 | 72.7% | Mostly D |
| ▸Calcasieu | 10 | 4.00 | 0.26 | 80.0% | Mixed D/F |
| ▸Rapides | 9 | 3.85 | 0.29 | 88.9% | Mixed D/F |
| ▸Lafayette | 9 | 3.81 | 0.21 | 77.8% | Mostly F |
| ▸St. Tammany | 9 | 4.05 | 0.36 | 100.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Ouachita | 9 | 3.78 | 0.23 | 77.8% | Mostly F |
| ▸Bossier | 8 | 4.33 | 0.93 | 62.5% | Mixed D/F |
| ▸Avoyelles | 8 | 3.13 | 0.26 | 75.0% | Mixed F/C |
| ▸St. Landry | 7 | 3.88 | 0.28 | 85.7% | Mostly D |
| ▸Vermilion | 6 | 3.65 | 0.23 | 66.7% | Mostly F |
| ▸Tangipahoa | 6 | 3.89 | 0.24 | 83.3% | Mixed D/F |
| ▸Acadia | 5 | 3.83 | 0.20 | 80.0% | Mostly F |
| ▸Iberia | 5 | 3.00 | 0.15 | 80.0% | Mostly F |
| ▸Jeffrson Davis | 4 | 5.62 | 0.81 | 75.0% | Mixed F/A+ |
| ▸Morehouse | 4 | 3.93 | 0.22 | 75.0% | Mostly F |
| ▸Evangeline | 4 | 3.88 | 0.24 | 75.0% | Mixed D/F |
| ▸Franklin | 4 | 4.02 | 0.29 | 100.0% | Mixed F/C |
| ▸Lafourche | 4 | 3.73 | 0.35 | 100.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Ascension | 3 | 3.52 | 0.25 | 66.7% | Mostly F |
| ▸Claiborne | 3 | 3.52 | 0.45 | 33.3% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Lincoln | 3 | 3.38 | 0.19 | 33.3% | Mostly F |
| ▸Natchitoches | 3 | 4.11 | 0.28 | 100.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Bienville | 3 | 3.63 | 0.16 | 66.7% | Mostly F |
| ▸Richland | 3 | 3.72 | 0.33 | 66.7% | Mostly D |
| ▸St. Mary | 3 | 3.43 | 0.18 | 33.3% | Mostly F |
| ▸Terrebonne | 3 | 3.48 | 0.27 | 66.7% | Mostly F |
| ▸Union | 3 | 3.71 | 0.30 | 66.7% | Mostly D |
| ▸Washington | 3 | 3.63 | 0.27 | 66.7% | Mostly D |
| ▸Webster | 3 | 3.70 | 0.29 | 66.7% | Mostly D |
| ▸East Feliciana | 2 | 3.52 | 0.43 | 50.0% | Mixed B/F |
| ▸Allen | 2 | 3.67 | 0.31 | 100.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Sabine | 2 | 3.76 | 0.20 | 100.0% | Mixed D/F |
| ▸St. Charles | 2 | 3.72 | 0.20 | 50.0% | Mostly F |
| ▸Beauregard | 2 | 3.74 | 0.26 | 100.0% | Mixed D/F |
| ▸St. Martin | 2 | 3.99 | 0.20 | 100.0% | Mixed D/F |
| ▸De Soto | 2 | 3.81 | 0.24 | 100.0% | Mixed D/F |
| ▸Iberville | 2 | 3.42 | 0.16 | 50.0% | Mostly F |
| ▸Jackson | 2 | 3.73 | 0.31 | 100.0% | Mixed D/F |
| ▸Winn | 2 | 3.96 | 0.29 | 100.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Grant | 2 | 2.95 | 0.17 | 50.0% | Mostly F |
| ▸Lasalle | 2 | 4.59 | 0.30 | 100.0% | Mixed D/F |
| ▸West Carroll | 2 | 3.29 | 0.19 | 0.0% | Mostly F |
| ▸Livingston | 2 | 3.40 | 0.14 | 0.0% | Mostly F |
| ▸Pointe Coupee | 2 | 3.51 | 0.17 | 50.0% | Mostly F |
| ▸Vernon | 2 | 3.36 | 0.27 | 50.0% | Mixed D/F |
| ▸Catahoula | 1 | 3.63 | 0.38 | 100.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Caldwell | 1 | 4.61 | 0.26 | 100.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Plaquemines | 1 | 3.97 | 0.22 | 100.0% | Mostly F |
| ▸W. Baton Rouge | 1 | 3.31 | 0.20 | 0.0% | Mostly F |
| ▸Concordia | 1 | 3.52 | 0.30 | 100.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Red River | 1 | 4.15 | 0.19 | 100.0% | Mostly F |
| ▸West Feliciana | 1 | 3.18 | 0.10 | 0.0% | Mostly F |
| ▸Assumption | 1 | 3.33 | 0.18 | 0.0% | Mostly F |
| ▸East Carroll | 1 | 3.31 | 0.21 | 0.0% | Mostly F |
| ▸St. James | 1 | 3.41 | 0.27 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸St. John Baptist | 1 | 3.38 | 0.35 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Madison | 1 | 3.63 | 0.19 | 100.0% | Mostly F |
The spread between best and worst staffed facilities
Source: CMS Staffing & Quality Data — 2025Q3 · data.cms.gov
Staffing grades are based on CMS-published thresholds and research recommendations. CMS is not affiliated with and does not endorse this website.