Home›North Carolina›Rowan County›Salisbury Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
C
Below Standard

Salisbury Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

635 Statesville Boulevard · Salisbury, NC 28144

7046337390 · For profit - Corporation

185 beds111 residents315 staff
CMS Five-Star Ratings
Overall
★★★★★
Staffing
★★★★★
Quality
★★★★★
Inspections
★★★★★
Staffing Grades
C
Below Standard
Total Staff
C
Below Standard
RN Staff
C
Below Standard
Overall
✗CMS Benchmark(≥ 3.48 HPRD)
✗RN Recommendation(≥ 0.75 HPRD)
✗Research Standard(≥ 4.10 HPRD)
📋

What This Means in Plain English

Salisbury Rehabilitation and Nursing Center receives an overall staffing grade of C (Below Standard). With 3.2965 total nurse hours per resident per day, this facility falls below the CMS staffing benchmark of 3.48 HPRD and has RN staffing of 0.4388 HPRD, below the recommended 0.75. It is 0.60 HPRD below the national average.

Weekend staffing decreases noticeably — dropping 17.95% compared to weekdays. The facility relies heavily on temporary agency staff (26.85% of hours), suggesting potential workforce instability.

Staffing levels have been declining over recent quarters — worth monitoring.

🔍 Areas of Concern (3)

🚨Does not meet the CMS staffing benchmark of 3.48 HPRD. Current: 3.2965 HPRD — needs 0.18 more hours per resident per day.
⚠️RN staffing (0.4388 HPRD) is below the research-recommended minimum of 0.75 HPRD. This means less clinical oversight per resident.
⚠️26.85% of nursing hours come from agency/contract workers. High contractor reliance often means less continuity of care — staff who don't know the residents.

✨ Strengths (1)

✅No days with zero registered nurse hours this quarter
Total Nurse HPRD
3.2965hrs/resident/day▼ 0.60
CMS benchmark: 3.48
RN HPRD
0.4388hrs/resident/day▼ 0.24
Recommended: 0.75
Weekend Drop-off
17.95%
3.4727 weekday → 2.8494 weekend
Agency Staff
26.85%
30.06% of RN hours from contractors
⚠ High contractor reliance
Days with Zero RN
0days this quarter
4+ days = auto 1-star
CNA HPRD
1.786hrs/resident/day
Direct care aides
LPN HPRD
0.5861hrs/resident/day
Licensed practical nurses
Consistency
0.3277std dev
Lower = more predictable

HPRD Over Time

Total nurse staffing hours per resident per day, by quarter

Total HPRD (shaded area)RN HPRDCMS Benchmark (3.48) — staffing standardResearch Standard (4.10) — recommended level

How Does This Facility Compare?

Compared to county, state, and national averages for total nurse HPRD

vs. Rowan County Average-0.58 HPRD
3.88
03.30 HPRD
vs. North Carolina State Average-0.47 HPRD
3.77
03.30 HPRD
vs. National Average-0.60 HPRD
3.90
03.30 HPRD
■ Colored bar = this facility · | Black line = average · Based on 2025Q3 data

Nearby Facilities

Compare with other nursing homes in the area

FacilityDistanceGradeTotal HPRDRN HPRDCMS Rating
Salisbury Rehabilitation and Nursing Center ★
Salisbury · This facility
—
C
3.29650.4388★☆☆☆☆
Piedmont Health & Rehab Center
Salisbury
1.5 mi
C
3.81640.4399★★★☆☆
Compass Healthcare and Rehab Rowan, LLC
Spencer
2.7 mi
D
3.0830.393★☆☆☆☆
Trinity Oaks
Salisbury
3 mi
A
4.75920.7698★★★★☆
Autumn Care of Salisbury
Salisbury
3.2 mi
C
3.2610.514★★★☆☆
Davidson Health & Rehab Center
Lexington
11.5 mi
D
3.54150.3641★★☆☆☆

Inspection History & Penalties

Health inspection results from state surveys — most recent first

9
Inspections
42
Total Deficiencies
$41,464
Fines Assessed
Jan 2, 2026Health
3 deficiencies cited· Includes actual harm
▼
Feb 12, 2025Health
3 deficiencies cited
▼
Sep 27, 2024Health
3 deficiencies cited
▼
Jan 19, 2024Health
1 deficiency cited· Includes actual harm
▼
Dec 18, 2023Health
3 deficiencies cited
▼
Jul 28, 2023Health
3 deficiencies cited
▼
Apr 6, 2023Health
10 deficiencies cited
▼
Mar 2, 2023Health
2 deficiencies cited
▼
May 6, 2022Health
14 deficiencies cited
▼

Penalty History

Dec 18, 2023Fine
$33,279
Mar 2, 2023Fine
$4,092
Mar 2, 2023Fine
$4,093
CMS Severity Scale
A–C: No Harm / PotentialD–F: No Harm but ConcernG–H: Actual HarmI–L: Immediate Jeopardy

Source: CMS Staffing & Quality Data — 2025Q3 · data.cms.gov

Staffing grades are based on CMS-published thresholds and research recommendations. CMS is not affiliated with and does not endorse this website.