Nursing Home Staffing Profile — 2025Q3
How North Carolina's 406 facilities grade out
Where facilities fall across the staffing spectrum
For-profit facilities consistently staff lower than non-profit and government-run homes
Top 5 by total nurse HPRD
Bottom 5 by total nurse HPRD
Pick any two North Carolina nursing homes and see how they stack up across every metric
Staffing metrics by county in North Carolina — click a county to see individual facilities
| County | Facilities ↓ | Avg HPRD | RN HPRD | Meet Benchmark | Grades |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸Mecklenburg | 26 | 3.81 | 0.59 | 57.7% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Guilford | 20 | 3.93 | 0.54 | 80.0% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Wake | 19 | 4.11 | 0.61 | 89.5% | Mostly C |
| ▸Buncombe | 18 | 3.74 | 0.78 | 50.0% | Mixed D/B |
| ▸Forsyth | 13 | 4.13 | 0.51 | 61.5% | Mixed B/D |
| ▸Durham | 12 | 3.85 | 0.55 | 75.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸New Hanover | 11 | 3.81 | 0.74 | 81.8% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Cumberland | 10 | 3.57 | 0.40 | 40.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Gaston | 10 | 3.87 | 0.64 | 70.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Henderson | 9 | 3.83 | 0.80 | 55.6% | Mostly C |
| ▸Davidson | 9 | 3.82 | 0.50 | 55.6% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Rowan | 9 | 3.88 | 0.61 | 55.6% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Moore | 7 | 4.12 | 0.62 | 42.9% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Union | 7 | 3.72 | 0.61 | 71.4% | Mostly C |
| ▸Alamance | 7 | 4.24 | 0.58 | 71.4% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Cabarrus | 6 | 3.55 | 0.46 | 33.3% | Mostly C |
| ▸Pitt | 6 | 3.94 | 0.73 | 66.7% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Robeson | 6 | 3.74 | 0.39 | 83.3% | Mostly C |
| ▸Randolph | 6 | 3.52 | 0.36 | 33.3% | Mixed D/B |
| ▸Catawba | 6 | 4.56 | 0.80 | 83.3% | Mixed A/C |
| ▸Johnston | 5 | 3.48 | 0.53 | 60.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Brunswick | 5 | 3.71 | 0.64 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Burke | 5 | 3.72 | 0.50 | 80.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Craven | 5 | 3.55 | 0.51 | 40.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Harnett | 5 | 3.63 | 0.48 | 40.0% | Mixed C/A |
| ▸Haywood | 5 | 3.58 | 0.62 | 60.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Iredell | 5 | 3.25 | 0.53 | 20.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Rockingham | 5 | 3.78 | 0.53 | 40.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Rutherford | 5 | 3.58 | 0.39 | 60.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Surry | 5 | 3.90 | 0.82 | 60.0% | Mixed B/A |
| ▸Stokes | 4 | 3.28 | 0.46 | 50.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Stanly | 4 | 3.73 | 0.51 | 75.0% | Mixed B/D |
| ▸Wilkes | 4 | 4.66 | 1.40 | 50.0% | Mixed D/A+ |
| ▸Caldwell | 4 | 3.56 | 0.50 | 50.0% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Cleveland | 4 | 3.66 | 0.41 | 50.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Wilson | 4 | 3.64 | 0.41 | 75.0% | Mixed D/B |
| ▸Halifax | 4 | 3.46 | 0.54 | 25.0% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Chatham | 3 | 3.92 | 0.61 | 66.7% | Mixed A/C |
| ▸Duplin | 3 | 3.26 | 0.37 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Wayne | 3 | 3.41 | 0.50 | 33.3% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Transylvania | 3 | 5.11 | 1.71 | 66.7% | Mixed A+/B |
| ▸Davie | 3 | 3.72 | 0.32 | 33.3% | Mostly D |
| ▸Carteret | 3 | 3.32 | 0.66 | 33.3% | Mostly C |
| ▸Lenoir | 3 | 3.92 | 0.67 | 66.7% | Mostly C |
| ▸Lee | 3 | 3.47 | 0.33 | 66.7% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Lincoln | 3 | 3.55 | 0.55 | 66.7% | Mostly C |
| ▸Edgecombe | 3 | 3.78 | 0.39 | 66.7% | Mostly D |
| ▸Vance | 3 | 3.79 | 0.34 | 66.7% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Polk | 3 | 4.11 | 1.00 | 66.7% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Orange | 3 | 4.45 | 1.16 | 100.0% | Mixed A+/B |
| ▸Nash | 3 | 3.73 | 0.52 | 100.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Scotland | 2 | 4.58 | 0.52 | 100.0% | Mixed A/D |
| ▸Franklin | 2 | 3.23 | 0.42 | 0.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Cherokee | 2 | 3.38 | 0.76 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Granville | 2 | 3.19 | 0.38 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Watauga | 2 | 3.57 | 0.42 | 50.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Jackson | 2 | 3.67 | 0.63 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Mc Dowell | 2 | 3.40 | 0.75 | 50.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Macon | 2 | 3.98 | 0.91 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Madison | 2 | 3.27 | 0.61 | 50.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Bladen | 2 | 3.61 | 0.55 | 100.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Bertie | 2 | 3.33 | 0.46 | 50.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Northampton | 2 | 3.31 | 0.35 | 50.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Onslow | 2 | 3.57 | 0.54 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Pasquotank | 2 | 3.32 | 0.31 | 50.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Pender | 2 | 4.27 | 0.69 | 100.0% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Person | 2 | 3.17 | 0.52 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Beaufort | 2 | 3.20 | 0.40 | 0.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Richmond | 2 | 3.58 | 0.60 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Anson | 2 | 3.53 | 0.59 | 50.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Yadkin | 2 | 3.20 | 0.39 | 0.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Sampson | 2 | 3.50 | 0.28 | 50.0% | Mixed D/F |
| ▸Swain | 2 | 4.71 | 0.88 | 50.0% | Mixed A+/C |
| ▸Columbus | 2 | 3.75 | 0.34 | 50.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Chowan | 1 | 3.49 | 0.40 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Ashe | 1 | 3.13 | 0.51 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Jones | 1 | 3.53 | 0.55 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Currituck | 1 | 3.39 | 0.45 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Dare | 1 | 2.99 | 0.58 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Graham | 1 | 3.22 | 0.63 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Clay | 1 | 3.16 | 0.56 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Hoke | 1 | 3.03 | 0.30 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Hertford | 1 | 3.51 | 0.45 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Yancey | 1 | 3.16 | 0.78 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Montgomery | 1 | 3.28 | 0.38 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Gates | 1 | 3.50 | 0.57 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Caswell | 1 | 3.06 | 0.26 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Alleghany | 1 | 2.98 | 0.30 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Mitchell | 1 | 3.46 | 0.56 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Pamlico | 1 | 3.21 | 0.75 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Greene | 1 | 3.72 | 0.30 | 100.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Alexander | 1 | 4.31 | 0.60 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Perquimans | 1 | 3.15 | 0.47 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Warren | 1 | 3.66 | 0.38 | 100.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Washington | 1 | 3.01 | 0.33 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Martin | 1 | 2.76 | 0.36 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Avery | 1 | 3.04 | 0.41 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
The spread between best and worst staffed facilities
Source: CMS Staffing & Quality Data — 2025Q3 · data.cms.gov
Staffing grades are based on CMS-published thresholds and research recommendations. CMS is not affiliated with and does not endorse this website.