Nursing Home Staffing Profile — 2025Q3
How Utah's 97 facilities grade out
Where facilities fall across the staffing spectrum
For-profit facilities consistently staff lower than non-profit and government-run homes
Top 5 by total nurse HPRD
Bottom 5 by total nurse HPRD
Pick any two Utah nursing homes and see how they stack up across every metric
Staffing metrics by county in Utah — click a county to see individual facilities
| County | Facilities ↓ | Avg HPRD | RN HPRD | Meet Benchmark | Grades |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸Salt Lake | 35 | 3.79 | 1.10 | 57.1% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Utah | 13 | 4.10 | 1.33 | 84.6% | Mixed B/A |
| ▸Weber | 11 | 3.74 | 0.96 | 45.5% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Washington | 8 | 4.33 | 1.03 | 75.0% | Mixed A+/B |
| ▸Davis | 6 | 4.71 | 1.45 | 83.3% | Mixed B/A+ |
| ▸Cache | 4 | 5.68 | 2.16 | 100.0% | Mixed A/A+ |
| ▸Box Elder | 3 | 3.81 | 1.17 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Carbon | 2 | 3.32 | 1.23 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Iron | 2 | 4.10 | 0.83 | 100.0% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Sevier | 2 | 4.23 | 1.50 | 100.0% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Millard | 1 | 3.55 | 0.84 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Garfield | 1 | 6.64 | 2.13 | 100.0% | Mostly A+ |
| ▸San Juan | 1 | 3.33 | 0.43 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Sanpete | 1 | 2.93 | 0.74 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Grand | 1 | 4.45 | 1.12 | 100.0% | Mostly A |
| ▸Tooele | 1 | 3.68 | 0.75 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Uintah | 1 | 6.26 | 1.79 | 100.0% | Mostly A+ |
| ▸Emery | 1 | 4.07 | 1.50 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Wasatch | 1 | 4.02 | 1.38 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Duchesne | 1 | 3.88 | 0.84 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Juab | 1 | 3.91 | 1.09 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
The spread between best and worst staffed facilities
Source: CMS Staffing & Quality Data — 2025Q3 · data.cms.gov
Staffing grades are based on CMS-published thresholds and research recommendations. CMS is not affiliated with and does not endorse this website.