Nursing Home Staffing Profile — 2025Q3
How Pennsylvania's 655 facilities grade out
Where facilities fall across the staffing spectrum
For-profit facilities consistently staff lower than non-profit and government-run homes
Top 5 by total nurse HPRD
Bottom 5 by total nurse HPRD
Pick any two Pennsylvania nursing homes and see how they stack up across every metric
Staffing metrics by county in Pennsylvania — click a county to see individual facilities
| County | Facilities ↓ | Avg HPRD | RN HPRD | Meet Benchmark | Grades |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸Montgomery | 58 | 4.04 | 0.93 | 63.8% | Mixed C/A |
| ▸Allegheny | 52 | 3.74 | 0.90 | 55.8% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Philadelphia | 46 | 4.03 | 0.74 | 73.9% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Lancaster | 31 | 4.25 | 0.79 | 67.7% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Bucks | 29 | 4.08 | 0.91 | 72.4% | Mixed C/A |
| ▸Delaware | 28 | 4.07 | 0.83 | 67.9% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Luzerne | 22 | 3.69 | 0.66 | 72.7% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Chester | 20 | 4.14 | 0.82 | 60.0% | Mixed C/A |
| ▸Westmoreland | 19 | 3.67 | 0.78 | 63.2% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Erie | 18 | 3.96 | 0.74 | 77.8% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Cumberland | 17 | 3.97 | 0.81 | 64.7% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Lehigh | 16 | 4.10 | 1.01 | 56.3% | Mixed C/A+ |
| ▸Lackawanna | 16 | 3.99 | 0.71 | 81.3% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Berks | 15 | 3.83 | 0.75 | 40.0% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸York | 14 | 3.83 | 0.63 | 57.1% | Mostly C |
| ▸Schuylkill | 13 | 3.52 | 0.58 | 23.1% | Mostly C |
| ▸Washington | 12 | 3.51 | 0.75 | 58.3% | Mostly C |
| ▸Northampton | 12 | 3.70 | 0.73 | 41.7% | Mostly C |
| ▸Butler | 11 | 4.07 | 0.99 | 81.8% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Lebanon | 10 | 4.16 | 0.83 | 80.0% | Mixed A/C |
| ▸Mercer | 10 | 3.68 | 0.70 | 70.0% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Blair | 10 | 3.96 | 0.75 | 90.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Franklin | 9 | 4.57 | 1.08 | 88.9% | Mixed A+/B |
| ▸Cambria | 9 | 3.96 | 1.01 | 66.7% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Dauphin | 8 | 3.58 | 0.55 | 50.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Lycoming | 8 | 3.72 | 0.59 | 62.5% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Lawrence | 8 | 3.56 | 0.74 | 50.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Fayette | 7 | 3.63 | 0.67 | 85.7% | Mostly B |
| ▸Northumberlnd | 7 | 3.62 | 0.53 | 57.1% | Mostly C |
| ▸Mc Kean | 6 | 3.97 | 0.83 | 66.7% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Beaver | 6 | 3.39 | 0.74 | 33.3% | Mostly C |
| ▸Centre | 6 | 4.44 | 0.72 | 83.3% | Mixed A/C |
| ▸Crawford | 6 | 4.78 | 1.08 | 83.3% | Mixed D/A+ |
| ▸Adams | 6 | 3.71 | 0.76 | 66.7% | Mixed A/C |
| ▸Somerset | 6 | 3.87 | 0.62 | 66.7% | Mostly C |
| ▸Venango | 5 | 4.43 | 1.25 | 60.0% | Mixed C/A+ |
| ▸Indiana | 5 | 3.78 | 0.59 | 80.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Jefferson | 4 | 3.41 | 0.69 | 50.0% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Columbia | 4 | 3.32 | 0.54 | 50.0% | Mixed D/B |
| ▸Monroe | 4 | 3.43 | 0.59 | 50.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Clearfield | 4 | 3.90 | 0.59 | 100.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Armstrong | 4 | 4.53 | 1.05 | 50.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Bradford | 4 | 3.22 | 0.54 | 25.0% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Huntingdon | 3 | 3.66 | 0.51 | 100.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Wayne | 3 | 3.17 | 0.45 | 33.3% | Mostly C |
| ▸Perry | 3 | 3.60 | 0.61 | 66.7% | Mostly C |
| ▸Juniata | 3 | 3.94 | 0.71 | 66.7% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Susquehanna | 3 | 3.34 | 0.65 | 33.3% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Union | 3 | 4.13 | 0.57 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Warren | 3 | 3.58 | 0.52 | 66.7% | Mostly C |
| ▸Mifflin | 3 | 3.68 | 0.48 | 66.7% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Carbon | 2 | 2.08 | 0.28 | 0.0% | Mixed D/F |
| ▸Potter | 2 | 4.16 | 1.01 | 50.0% | Mixed A+/C |
| ▸Elk | 2 | 3.83 | 0.83 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Greene | 2 | 3.43 | 0.47 | 50.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Clinton | 2 | 3.84 | 0.62 | 100.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Bedford | 2 | 3.59 | 0.90 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Clarion | 2 | 3.43 | 0.65 | 50.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Pike | 2 | 3.78 | 0.74 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Sullivan | 2 | 3.59 | 0.62 | 50.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Tioga | 2 | 3.99 | 0.75 | 100.0% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Cameron | 1 | 4.10 | 0.97 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Snyder | 1 | 3.47 | 0.38 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Fulton | 1 | 4.34 | 0.69 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Wyoming | 1 | 3.73 | 0.77 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Forest | 1 | 3.64 | 0.47 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Montour | 1 | 3.76 | 0.52 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
The spread between best and worst staffed facilities
Source: CMS Staffing & Quality Data — 2025Q3 · data.cms.gov
Staffing grades are based on CMS-published thresholds and research recommendations. CMS is not affiliated with and does not endorse this website.