HomeStatesNew York

New York

Nursing Home Staffing Profile — 2025Q3

589 facilities97,950 residents3.65 avg HPRD
vs National Average
-0.24 HPRD
National avg: 3.90 · New York: 3.65
📋
New York ranks among the lower-performing states for nursing home staffing, with an average of 3.65 HPRD — 0.24 hours below the national average. Only 52.1% of facilities meet the CMS staffing benchmark of 3.48 HPRD, compared to 65.8% nationally. RN staffing averages 0.70 HPRD, with 25.8% of facilities meeting the 0.75 research recommendation.
3.65
Average Total HPRD
All nursing staff combined
0.24 vs national
0.70
Average RN HPRD
Recommended: 0.75
0.01 vs national
52.1%
Meet CMS Benchmark
307 of 589 facilities
17.9%
Avg Weekend Drop-off
Staffing reduction on Sat/Sun
9.0%
Avg Agency Staff
Contractor/temp worker hours
Had Zero-RN Days
Data unavailable
3.53
Median HPRD
50th percentile (less skewed by outliers)
19
F-Rated Facilities
Under 2.5 HPRD — critically understaffed

Grade Distribution

How New York's 589 facilities grade out

HPRD Distribution

Where facilities fall across the staffing spectrum

Staffing by Ownership Type

For-profit facilities consistently staff lower than non-profit and government-run homes

F
For-Profit
3.47
avg HPRD
409 facilities (69%)
N
Non-Profit
4.00
avg HPRD
151 facilities (26%)
G
Government
4.47
avg HPRD
29 facilities (5%)
💡 Non-profit facilities in New York average 0.53 more HPRD than for-profit ones — about 15% higher staffing.
⚖️

Compare Two Facilities Side by Side

Pick any two New York nursing homes and see how they stack up across every metric

Open Comparison Tool →

County Breakdown

Staffing metrics by county in New York — click a county to see individual facilities

Avg HPRD— total nurse hours per resident per day:≥ 3.48 meets federal benchmark,3.0–3.47 below benchmark,< 3.0 critically low
Meet Benchmark— share of facilities in the county at or above the 3.48 HPRD federal minimum:≥ 50%35–49%< 35%
CountyFacilities Avg HPRD RN HPRDMeet Benchmark Grades
Queens543.440.7642.6%Mixed B/C
Westchester424.161.1957.1%Mixed C/B
Bronx423.230.6526.2%Mixed D/C
Suffolk413.840.8158.5%Mixed B/C
Kings403.560.7150.0%Mixed B/C
Nassau363.720.8058.3%Mixed C/B
Erie343.810.6270.6%Mixed C/B
Monroe323.930.4978.1%Mixed C/D
Oneida173.520.4252.9%Mixed C/D
New York163.780.9950.0%Mixed C/B
Onondaga144.170.9378.6%Mixed C/B
Dutchess123.190.4333.3%Mixed D/C
Albany114.370.7172.7%Mixed D/A
Richmond103.470.7550.0%Mixed D/C
Niagara103.380.5350.0%Mixed C/F
Rockland104.151.0670.0%Mixed B/A+
Orange103.670.7160.0%Mixed C/B
Broome93.930.5366.7%Mixed B/C
Rensselaer93.580.5366.7%Mixed C/B
Ulster73.820.6171.4%Mixed C/B
Steuben63.420.4316.7%Mixed C/D
Schenectady53.940.7180.0%Mixed C/A
Cattaraugus53.590.5140.0%Mostly C
Chautauqua52.880.430.0%Mixed C/D
Montgomery53.300.4740.0%Mostly C
Ontario53.960.5260.0%Mixed B/D
Tompkins53.870.6280.0%Mixed D/A
Allegany43.580.6350.0%Mixed B/C
Herkimer43.310.5150.0%Mixed C/B
Genesee43.240.410.0%Mixed D/C
Oswego43.210.410.0%Mixed C/D
Columbia42.690.4625.0%Mixed D/C
St. Lawrence43.370.6425.0%Mostly C
Clinton43.370.7225.0%Mixed C/A
Chemung43.960.5275.0%Mixed B/C
Cayuga43.620.4625.0%Mixed D/B
Warren43.230.5725.0%Mostly C
Washington43.390.490.0%Mostly C
Wayne43.720.4750.0%Mixed D/B
Essex32.910.450.0%Mostly D
Delaware33.380.5766.7%Mixed B/C
Cortland33.840.5633.3%Mixed A/C
Livingston33.500.5933.3%Mostly C
Chenango33.930.75100.0%Mostly B
Jefferson31.420.360.0%Mostly F
Madison33.550.6933.3%Mostly C
Sullivan33.390.4933.3%Mostly C
Orleans33.480.5033.3%Mixed B/C
Otsego33.380.5733.3%Mixed B/C
Franklin24.120.96100.0%Mixed A/B
Putnam23.320.5050.0%Mixed B/C
Greene23.530.4150.0%Mixed C/D
Tioga23.070.4350.0%Mixed C/F
Yates23.610.3950.0%Mixed C/D
Saratoga23.880.56100.0%Mixed B/C
Fulton23.900.60100.0%Mixed A/D
Wyoming23.360.4550.0%Mixed C/D
Lewis14.260.85100.0%Mostly A
Schuyler14.130.65100.0%Mostly B
Seneca13.850.36100.0%Mostly D

HPRD Range in New York

The spread between best and worst staffed facilities

3.21
25th pctile
3.53
Median
3.93
75th pctile

Source: CMS Staffing & Quality Data — 2025Q3 · data.cms.gov

Staffing grades are based on CMS-published thresholds and research recommendations. CMS is not affiliated with and does not endorse this website.