Nursing Home Staffing Profile — 2025Q3
How Nebraska's 177 facilities grade out
Where facilities fall across the staffing spectrum
For-profit facilities consistently staff lower than non-profit and government-run homes
Top 5 by total nurse HPRD
Bottom 5 by total nurse HPRD
Pick any two Nebraska nursing homes and see how they stack up across every metric
Staffing metrics by county in Nebraska — click a county to see individual facilities
| County | Facilities ↓ | Avg HPRD | RN HPRD | Meet Benchmark | Grades |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸Douglas | 23 | 4.39 | 0.80 | 82.6% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Lancaster | 14 | 4.77 | 0.80 | 92.9% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Hall | 6 | 4.94 | 1.06 | 83.3% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Madison | 5 | 3.87 | 0.58 | 60.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Sarpy | 5 | 4.28 | 0.64 | 80.0% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Buffalo | 5 | 4.52 | 0.76 | 60.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Scott Bluff | 4 | 4.13 | 0.58 | 100.0% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Lincoln | 4 | 3.81 | 0.66 | 75.0% | Mixed B/A |
| ▸Gage | 3 | 3.77 | 0.57 | 100.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Otoe | 3 | 3.65 | 0.49 | 66.7% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Phelps | 3 | 3.71 | 0.84 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Knox | 3 | 3.77 | 1.20 | 66.7% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Holt | 3 | 3.61 | 0.63 | 66.7% | Mostly B |
| ▸Cuming | 3 | 4.38 | 0.76 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Saunders | 3 | 4.42 | 0.46 | 100.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Dakota | 3 | 3.42 | 0.76 | 33.3% | Mostly C |
| ▸Cedar | 3 | 3.83 | 0.88 | 66.7% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Sheridan | 3 | 4.49 | 1.10 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Richardson | 3 | 3.35 | 0.33 | 33.3% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Dodge | 3 | 4.32 | 0.97 | 100.0% | Mostly A |
| ▸York | 2 | 3.82 | 0.66 | 100.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Boone | 2 | 3.49 | 0.72 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Box Butte | 2 | 4.72 | 0.65 | 100.0% | Mixed A/C |
| ▸Burt | 2 | 3.73 | 0.54 | 100.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Butler | 2 | 4.04 | 0.42 | 100.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Cass | 2 | 3.76 | 0.69 | 50.0% | Mixed A/D |
| ▸Chase | 2 | 4.06 | 0.66 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Clay | 2 | 4.95 | 0.81 | 100.0% | Mostly A |
| ▸Custer | 2 | 3.78 | 0.68 | 50.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Dawes | 2 | 3.81 | 0.84 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Dawson | 2 | 3.96 | 0.60 | 100.0% | Mixed B/D |
| ▸Fillmore | 2 | 4.27 | 0.55 | 100.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Hamilton | 2 | 4.47 | 0.45 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Jefferson | 2 | 3.97 | 0.70 | 50.0% | Mixed A/C |
| ▸Merrick | 2 | 3.15 | 0.49 | 0.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Morrill | 2 | 3.94 | 0.85 | 50.0% | Mixed A/C |
| ▸Nance | 2 | 3.26 | 0.47 | 0.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Pierce | 2 | 3.25 | 0.65 | 50.0% | Mixed B/D |
| ▸Platte | 2 | 4.20 | 0.45 | 100.0% | Mixed B/D |
| ▸Polk | 2 | 4.03 | 0.63 | 50.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Saline | 2 | 4.74 | 0.77 | 100.0% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Seward | 2 | 3.81 | 0.44 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Thayer | 2 | 3.80 | 0.78 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Washington | 2 | 3.83 | 0.49 | 50.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Webster | 2 | 4.00 | 0.54 | 100.0% | Mixed B/D |
| ▸Adams | 2 | 3.14 | 0.48 | 0.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Nuckolls | 1 | 3.51 | 0.56 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Furnas | 1 | 4.64 | 0.65 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Franklin | 1 | 3.06 | 0.71 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Antelope | 1 | 4.25 | 0.54 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Stanton | 1 | 4.00 | 0.79 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Wayne | 1 | 3.41 | 0.39 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Red Willow | 1 | 4.56 | 0.46 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Dundy | 1 | 4.36 | 0.43 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Rock | 1 | 6.41 | 1.06 | 100.0% | Mostly A+ |
| ▸Thurston | 1 | 5.98 | 1.32 | 100.0% | Mostly A+ |
| ▸Howard | 1 | 4.32 | 0.71 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Dixon | 1 | 5.24 | 0.84 | 100.0% | Mostly A |
| ▸Kearney | 1 | 4.37 | 0.83 | 100.0% | Mostly A |
| ▸Keith | 1 | 3.14 | 0.64 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Kimball | 1 | 3.73 | 0.43 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Harlan | 1 | 3.73 | 0.65 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Gosper | 1 | 3.99 | 0.64 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Garfield | 1 | 3.75 | 0.48 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Garden | 1 | 4.32 | 0.91 | 100.0% | Mostly A |
| ▸Cheyenne | 1 | 3.69 | 0.68 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Brown | 1 | 4.41 | 0.86 | 100.0% | Mostly A |
| ▸Valley | 1 | 3.03 | 0.34 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Nemaha | 1 | 3.49 | 0.58 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
The spread between best and worst staffed facilities
Source: CMS Staffing & Quality Data — 2025Q3 · data.cms.gov
Staffing grades are based on CMS-published thresholds and research recommendations. CMS is not affiliated with and does not endorse this website.