Nursing Home Staffing Profile — 2025Q3
How California's 1,139 facilities grade out
Where facilities fall across the staffing spectrum
For-profit facilities consistently staff lower than non-profit and government-run homes
Top 5 by total nurse HPRD
Bottom 5 by total nurse HPRD
Pick any two California nursing homes and see how they stack up across every metric
Staffing metrics by county in California — click a county to see individual facilities
| County | Facilities ↓ | Avg HPRD | RN HPRD | Meet Benchmark | Grades |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸Los Angeles | 363 | 4.56 | 0.60 | 97.8% | Mixed D/C |
| ▸San Diego | 80 | 4.64 | 0.74 | 98.8% | Mixed B/A |
| ▸Orange | 71 | 4.73 | 0.63 | 97.2% | Mixed D/C |
| ▸Alameda | 68 | 4.41 | 0.70 | 100.0% | Mixed B/A |
| ▸Riverside | 53 | 4.53 | 0.56 | 96.2% | Mostly D |
| ▸San Bernardino | 53 | 4.70 | 0.62 | 94.3% | Mixed D/C |
| ▸Santa Clara | 48 | 4.44 | 0.78 | 95.8% | Mixed B/A |
| ▸Sacramento | 36 | 4.40 | 0.73 | 100.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Contra Costa | 30 | 4.36 | 0.70 | 100.0% | Mixed C/A |
| ▸Fresno | 29 | 4.21 | 0.53 | 93.1% | Mixed D/C |
| ▸San Joaquin | 24 | 4.27 | 0.50 | 95.8% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Ventura | 19 | 4.69 | 0.71 | 94.7% | Mixed C/A |
| ▸Sonoma | 17 | 4.35 | 0.67 | 100.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Stanislaus | 17 | 3.97 | 0.45 | 88.2% | Mixed D/C |
| ▸San Francisco | 17 | 5.24 | 1.73 | 100.0% | Mixed A+/B |
| ▸Kern | 16 | 4.30 | 0.47 | 93.8% | Mostly D |
| ▸Tulare | 16 | 4.50 | 0.43 | 100.0% | Mixed D/F |
| ▸Santa Barbara | 14 | 4.33 | 0.66 | 92.9% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Monterey | 14 | 4.54 | 0.78 | 100.0% | Mixed A+/A |
| ▸San Mateo | 14 | 4.45 | 0.81 | 92.9% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Marin | 11 | 4.57 | 0.77 | 100.0% | Mixed C/A |
| ▸Placer | 10 | 4.18 | 0.62 | 100.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Merced | 10 | 4.18 | 0.33 | 100.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Shasta | 10 | 4.58 | 0.67 | 90.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Butte | 9 | 4.29 | 0.45 | 100.0% | Mixed D/C |
| ▸Solano | 8 | 4.76 | 0.95 | 100.0% | Mixed A/C |
| ▸Santa Cruz | 7 | 4.05 | 0.63 | 100.0% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Napa | 6 | 5.80 | 1.73 | 100.0% | Mixed A+/A |
| ▸San Luis Obispo | 6 | 5.24 | 0.76 | 100.0% | Mixed D/A+ |
| ▸Yolo | 6 | 4.18 | 0.87 | 83.3% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Humboldt | 5 | 5.07 | 0.50 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Madera | 5 | 4.05 | 0.44 | 80.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Nevada | 5 | 4.07 | 0.63 | 100.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Sutter | 4 | 4.01 | 0.63 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸El Dorado | 4 | 4.24 | 0.76 | 100.0% | Mixed B/A |
| ▸Mendocino | 4 | 3.77 | 0.44 | 75.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Lake | 3 | 3.85 | 0.36 | 66.7% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Kings | 3 | 4.06 | 0.19 | 100.0% | Mostly F |
| ▸Imperial | 3 | 4.01 | 0.26 | 100.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Tehama | 2 | 4.07 | 0.26 | 100.0% | Mixed D/F |
| ▸Colusa | 2 | 6.11 | 0.48 | 100.0% | Mixed B/F |
| ▸Inyo | 2 | 4.35 | 0.54 | 100.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Plumas | 2 | 5.49 | 0.71 | 100.0% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Tuolumne | 2 | 4.64 | 0.85 | 100.0% | Mixed A+/D |
| ▸San Benito | 1 | 4.52 | 0.95 | 100.0% | Mostly A |
| ▸Modoc | 1 | 4.93 | 0.33 | 100.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Mariposa | 1 | 6.20 | 0.56 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Lassen | 1 | 3.70 | 0.45 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Glenn | 1 | 3.70 | 0.24 | 100.0% | Mostly F |
| ▸Trinity | 1 | 5.97 | 0.39 | 100.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Del Norte | 1 | 3.39 | 0.24 | 0.0% | Mostly F |
| ▸Yuba | 1 | 4.03 | 0.64 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Calaveras | 1 | 4.04 | 0.35 | 100.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Amador | 1 | 4.44 | 1.00 | 100.0% | Mostly A |
| ▸Siskiyou | 1 | 4.95 | 1.02 | 100.0% | Mostly A |
The spread between best and worst staffed facilities
Source: CMS Staffing & Quality Data — 2025Q3 · data.cms.gov
Staffing grades are based on CMS-published thresholds and research recommendations. CMS is not affiliated with and does not endorse this website.