Home›Washington›Pierce County›ORCHARD PARK HEALTH CARE & REHAB CENTER
B
Good

ORCHARD PARK HEALTH CARE & REHAB CENTER

4755 SOUTH 48TH · TACOMA, WA 98409

2534754611 · For profit - Limited Liability company

147 beds116.1 residents147 staff
CMS Five-Star Ratings
Overall
★★★★★
Staffing
★★★★★
Quality
★★★★★
Inspections
★★★★★
Staffing Grades
B
Good
Total Staff
A
Very Good
RN Staff
B
Good
Overall
✓CMS Benchmark(≥ 3.48 HPRD)
✓RN Recommendation(≥ 0.75 HPRD)
✗Research Standard(≥ 4.10 HPRD)
📋

What This Means in Plain English

ORCHARD PARK HEALTH CARE & REHAB CENTER receives an overall staffing grade of B (Good). With 3.7833 total nurse hours per resident per day, this facility meets the CMS staffing benchmark and has adequate registered nurse (RN) coverage. It is 0.11 HPRD below the national average.

Weekend staffing decreases noticeably — dropping 17.08% compared to weekdays. The facility has low agency staff usage (0% of hours), suggesting a mostly permanent workforce.

Staffing levels have remained relatively stable over recent quarters.

🔍 Areas of Concern (0)

No significant concerns identified for this quarter.

✨ Strengths (4)

✅Meets the CMS staffing benchmark (≥ 3.48 HPRD)
✅Meets the research-recommended RN staffing level (≥ 0.75 HPRD)
✅No days with zero registered nurse hours this quarter
✅Low agency staff usage (0%) — mostly permanent, familiar staff
Total Nurse HPRD
3.7833hrs/resident/day▼ 0.11
CMS benchmark: 3.48
RN HPRD
0.7627hrs/resident/day▲ 0.08
Recommended: 0.75
Weekend Drop-off
17.08%
3.9752 weekday → 3.2962 weekend
Agency Staff
0%
0% of RN hours from contractors
Days with Zero RN
0days this quarter
4+ days = auto 1-star
CNA HPRD
1.9843hrs/resident/day
Direct care aides
LPN HPRD
1.0363hrs/resident/day
Licensed practical nurses
Consistency
0.3668std dev
Lower = more predictable

HPRD Over Time

Total nurse staffing hours per resident per day, by quarter

Total HPRD (shaded area)RN HPRDCMS Benchmark (3.48) — staffing standardResearch Standard (4.10) — recommended level

How Does This Facility Compare?

Compared to county, state, and national averages for total nurse HPRD

vs. Pierce County Average-0.62 HPRD
4.40
03.78 HPRD
vs. Washington State Average-0.50 HPRD
4.28
03.78 HPRD
vs. National Average-0.11 HPRD
3.90
03.78 HPRD
■ Colored bar = this facility · | Black line = average · Based on 2025Q3 data

Nearby Facilities

Compare with other nursing homes in the area

FacilityDistanceGradeTotal HPRDRN HPRDCMS Rating
ORCHARD PARK HEALTH CARE & REHAB CENTER ★
TACOMA · This facility
—
B
3.78330.7627★☆☆☆☆
BIRCH CREEK POST ACUTE & REHABILITATION
TACOMA
0.5 mi
B
3.69490.6055★★☆☆☆
AGILITY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION
UNIVERSITY PLACE
1.5 mi
C
3.83380.4993★★★☆☆
PARK ROSE CARE CENTER
TACOMA
2.1 mi
A+
5.13041.0501★★☆☆☆
ALASKA GARDENS HEALTH AND REHABILITATION
TACOMA
2.1 mi
D
3.76870.3516★☆☆☆☆
AVAMERE TRANSITIONAL CARE OF PUGET SOUND
TACOMA
3 mi
A
4.92931.571★★★★★

Inspection History & Penalties

Health inspection results from state surveys — most recent first

18
Inspections
106
Total Deficiencies
$101,384
Fines Assessed
Aug 25, 2025Health
1 deficiency cited
▼
Aug 8, 2025Health
1 deficiency cited
▼
Jul 30, 2025Health
1 deficiency cited
▼
Jun 12, 2025Health
18 deficiencies cited· Includes actual harm
▼
Apr 23, 2025Health
1 deficiency cited
▼
Sep 19, 2024Health
2 deficiencies cited
▼
Sep 9, 2024Health
34 deficiencies cited· Includes actual harm
▼
Jul 11, 2024Health
3 deficiencies cited
▼
Jun 7, 2024Health
2 deficiencies cited
▼
May 20, 2024Health
1 deficiency cited
▼
Apr 2, 2024Health
3 deficiencies cited
▼
Jan 31, 2024Health
1 deficiency cited
▼
Oct 27, 2023Health
29 deficiencies cited
▼
Sep 19, 2023Health
1 deficiency cited
▼
May 25, 2023Health
1 deficiency cited
▼
May 18, 2023Health
2 deficiencies cited
▼
May 11, 2023Health
1 deficiency cited
▼
Apr 28, 2023Health
4 deficiencies cited
▼

Penalty History

Sep 9, 2024Fine
$101,384
CMS Severity Scale
A–C: No Harm / PotentialD–F: No Harm but ConcernG–H: Actual HarmI–L: Immediate Jeopardy

Source: CMS Staffing & Quality Data — 2025Q3 · data.cms.gov

Staffing grades are based on CMS-published thresholds and research recommendations. CMS is not affiliated with and does not endorse this website.