HomeTexasHays CountyDeer Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation
D
Poor

Deer Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation

555 Ranch Rd 3237 · Wimberley, TX 78676

5128475540 · For profit - Corporation

122 beds74.9 residents118 staff
CMS Five-Star Ratings
Overall
Staffing
Quality
Inspections
Staffing Grades
D
Poor
Total Staff
C
Below Standard
RN Staff
D
Poor
Overall
CMS Benchmark(≥ 3.48 HPRD)
RN Recommendation(≥ 0.75 HPRD)
Research Standard(≥ 4.10 HPRD)
📋

What This Means in Plain English

Deer Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation receives an overall staffing grade of D (Poor). With 2.696 total nurse hours per resident per day, this facility falls below the CMS staffing benchmark of 3.48 HPRD and has RN staffing of 0.5221 HPRD, below the recommended 0.75. It is 1.20 HPRD below the national average.

Weekend staffing stays relatively consistent — dropping 14.76% compared to weekdays. The facility has low agency staff usage (3.63% of hours), suggesting a mostly permanent workforce.

Staffing levels have been declining over recent quarters — worth monitoring.

🔍 Areas of Concern (3)

⚠️Had 1 day with zero registered nurse hours this quarter. While below the 4-day threshold for an auto 1-star rating, any zero-RN day is a concern.
🚨Does not meet the CMS staffing benchmark of 3.48 HPRD. Current: 2.696 HPRD — needs 0.78 more hours per resident per day.
⚠️RN staffing (0.5221 HPRD) is below the research-recommended minimum of 0.75 HPRD. This means less clinical oversight per resident.

Strengths (2)

Low agency staff usage (3.63%) — mostly permanent, familiar staff
Highly consistent day-to-day staffing levels
Total Nurse HPRD
2.696hrs/resident/day 1.20
CMS benchmark: 3.48
RN HPRD
0.5221hrs/resident/day 0.16
Recommended: 0.75
Weekend Drop-off
14.76%
2.8133 weekday → 2.3981 weekend
Agency Staff
3.63%
1.22% of RN hours from contractors
Days with Zero RN
1days this quarter
4+ days = auto 1-star
CNA HPRD
1.2599hrs/resident/day
Direct care aides
LPN HPRD
0.5683hrs/resident/day
Licensed practical nurses
Consistency
0.2569std dev
Lower = more predictable

HPRD Over Time

Total nurse staffing hours per resident per day, by quarter

Total HPRD (shaded area)RN HPRDCMS Benchmark (3.48) — staffing standardResearch Standard (4.10) — recommended level

How Does This Facility Compare?

Compared to county, state, and national averages for total nurse HPRD

vs. Hays County Average-0.40 HPRD
3.09
02.70 HPRD
vs. Texas State Average-0.71 HPRD
3.40
02.70 HPRD
vs. National Average-1.20 HPRD
3.90
02.70 HPRD
■ Colored bar = this facility · | Black line = average · Based on 2025Q3 data

Nearby Facilities

Compare with other nursing homes in the area

FacilityDistanceGradeTotal HPRDRN HPRDCMS Rating
Deer Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation
Wimberley · This facility
D
2.6960.5221☆☆☆☆
Eden Home
New Braunfels
19.1 mi
B
4.41020.6408★★★☆☆
Avir at New Braunfels
New Braunfels
19.2 mi
F
3.39780.2148☆☆☆☆
KIRKWOOD MANOR
NEW BRAUNFELS
21.3 mi
C
3.47960.4678★★☆☆☆
BROOKDALE WESTLAKE HILLS
AUSTIN
25.8 mi
B
4.78670.7132☆☆☆☆
Heritage Park Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing C
Austin
29.9 mi
C
3.19750.4466★★☆☆☆

Inspection History & Penalties

Health inspection results from state surveys — most recent first

12
Inspections
35
Total Deficiencies
$65,147
Fines Assessed
Dec 22, 2025Health
1 deficiency cited
Dec 1, 2025Health
2 deficiencies cited
Sep 29, 2025Health
1 deficiency cited· Includes actual harm
Aug 1, 2025Health
2 deficiencies cited· Includes actual harm
Jun 26, 2025Health
10 deficiencies cited
Jun 11, 2025Health
2 deficiencies cited
May 5, 2025Health
2 deficiencies cited· Includes actual harm
Dec 4, 2024Health
1 deficiency cited
Jun 25, 2024Health
2 deficiencies cited
Apr 25, 2024Health
9 deficiencies cited
Sep 27, 2023Health
1 deficiency cited· Includes actual harm
Feb 28, 2023Health
2 deficiencies cited

Penalty History

Sep 29, 2025Fine
$19,135
May 5, 2025Fine
$20,482
Sep 27, 2023Fine
$25,530
CMS Severity Scale
A–C: No Harm / PotentialD–F: No Harm but ConcernG–H: Actual HarmI–L: Immediate Jeopardy

Source: CMS Staffing & Quality Data — 2025Q3 · data.cms.gov

Staffing grades are based on CMS-published thresholds and research recommendations. CMS is not affiliated with and does not endorse this website.