HomeMissouriSt. Louis CountyST SOPHIA HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER
D
Poor

ST SOPHIA HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER

936 CHARBONIER ROAD · FLORISSANT, MO 63031

3148314800 · For profit - Limited Liability company

240 beds167 residents189 staff
CMS Five-Star Ratings
Overall
Staffing
Quality
Inspections
Staffing Grades
D
Poor
Total Staff
D
Poor
RN Staff
D
Poor
Overall
CMS Benchmark(≥ 3.48 HPRD)
RN Recommendation(≥ 0.75 HPRD)
Research Standard(≥ 4.10 HPRD)
📋

What This Means in Plain English

ST SOPHIA HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER receives an overall staffing grade of D (Poor). With 2.9595 total nurse hours per resident per day, this facility falls below the CMS staffing benchmark of 3.48 HPRD and has RN staffing of 0.3143 HPRD, below the recommended 0.75. It is 0.94 HPRD below the national average.

Weekend staffing decreases noticeably — dropping 22.48% compared to weekdays. The facility has low agency staff usage (5.29% of hours), suggesting a mostly permanent workforce.

Staffing levels have been declining over recent quarters — worth monitoring.

🔍 Areas of Concern (2)

🚨Does not meet the CMS staffing benchmark of 3.48 HPRD. Current: 2.9595 HPRD — needs 0.52 more hours per resident per day.
⚠️RN staffing (0.3143 HPRD) is below the research-recommended minimum of 0.75 HPRD. This means less clinical oversight per resident.

Strengths (1)

No days with zero registered nurse hours this quarter
Total Nurse HPRD
2.9595hrs/resident/day 0.94
CMS benchmark: 3.48
RN HPRD
0.3143hrs/resident/day 0.37
Recommended: 0.75
Weekend Drop-off
22.48%
3.1603 weekday → 2.4498 weekend
Significant weekend reduction
Agency Staff
5.29%
21.48% of RN hours from contractors
Days with Zero RN
0days this quarter
4+ days = auto 1-star
CNA HPRD
1.6415hrs/resident/day
Direct care aides
LPN HPRD
0.5621hrs/resident/day
Licensed practical nurses
Consistency
0.4143std dev
Lower = more predictable

HPRD Over Time

Total nurse staffing hours per resident per day, by quarter

Total HPRD (shaded area)RN HPRDCMS Benchmark (3.48) — staffing standardResearch Standard (4.10) — recommended level

How Does This Facility Compare?

Compared to county, state, and national averages for total nurse HPRD

vs. St. Louis County Average-0.86 HPRD
3.82
02.96 HPRD
vs. Missouri State Average-0.52 HPRD
3.48
02.96 HPRD
vs. National Average-0.94 HPRD
3.90
02.96 HPRD
■ Colored bar = this facility · | Black line = average · Based on 2025Q3 data

Nearby Facilities

Compare with other nursing homes in the area

FacilityDistanceGradeTotal HPRDRN HPRDCMS Rating
ST SOPHIA HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER
FLORISSANT · This facility
D
2.95950.3143☆☆☆☆
FLORISSANT VALLEY HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER
FLORISSANT
1.7 mi
D
3.68030.3431☆☆☆☆
RANCHO REHAB AND HEALTHCARE CENTER
FLORISSANT
1.9 mi
C
3.17660.5051☆☆☆☆
PILLARS OF NORTH COUNTY HEALTH & REHAB CENTER, THE
FLORISSANT
3.8 mi
F
2.38160.2383★★☆☆☆
DELMAR GARDENS NORTH
BLACK JACK
3.8 mi
F
3.7530.1779☆☆☆☆
LIFE CARE CENTER OF BRIDGETON
BRIDGETON
4.6 mi
D
3.98840.3461★★★☆☆

Inspection History & Penalties

Health inspection results from state surveys — most recent first

14
Inspections
75
Total Deficiencies
$87,273
Fines Assessed
Dec 31, 2025Health
3 deficiencies cited
Nov 6, 2025Health
2 deficiencies cited
Oct 30, 2025Health
2 deficiencies cited
Oct 3, 2025Health
4 deficiencies cited
Aug 18, 2025Health
4 deficiencies cited
May 21, 2025Health
2 deficiencies cited
Jan 28, 2025Health
14 deficiencies cited· Includes actual harm
Nov 8, 2024Health
3 deficiencies cited
Sep 27, 2024Health
4 deficiencies cited
Jul 18, 2024Health
1 deficiency cited· Includes actual harm
Jun 3, 2024Health
1 deficiency cited
Oct 18, 2023Health
3 deficiencies cited· Includes actual harm
May 25, 2023Health
14 deficiencies cited
May 17, 2019Health
18 deficiencies cited

Penalty History

Jan 28, 2025Fine
$51,630
Jan 28, 2025Payment Denial
Jun 3, 2024Fine
$14,053
Oct 18, 2023Fine
$21,590
CMS Severity Scale
A–C: No Harm / PotentialD–F: No Harm but ConcernG–H: Actual HarmI–L: Immediate Jeopardy

Source: CMS Staffing & Quality Data — 2025Q3 · data.cms.gov

Staffing grades are based on CMS-published thresholds and research recommendations. CMS is not affiliated with and does not endorse this website.