Home›Missouri›Greene County›SPRING VALLEY HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER
D
Poor

SPRING VALLEY HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER

2915 SOUTH FREMONT AVE · SPRINGFIELD, MO 65804

4178834022 · For profit - Limited Liability company

194 beds152.3 residents144 staff
CMS Five-Star Ratings
Overall
★★★★★
Staffing
★★★★★
Quality
★★★★★
Inspections
★★★★★
Staffing Grades
D
Poor
Total Staff
D
Poor
RN Staff
D
Poor
Overall
✗CMS Benchmark(≥ 3.48 HPRD)
✗RN Recommendation(≥ 0.75 HPRD)
✗Research Standard(≥ 4.10 HPRD)
📋

What This Means in Plain English

SPRING VALLEY HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER receives an overall staffing grade of D (Poor). With 2.7811 total nurse hours per resident per day, this facility falls below the CMS staffing benchmark of 3.48 HPRD and has RN staffing of 0.3348 HPRD, below the recommended 0.75. It is 1.12 HPRD below the national average.

Weekend staffing decreases noticeably — dropping 24.64% compared to weekdays. The facility has low agency staff usage (0% of hours), suggesting a mostly permanent workforce.

Staffing levels have been trending upward over recent quarters.

🔍 Areas of Concern (2)

🚨Does not meet the CMS staffing benchmark of 3.48 HPRD. Current: 2.7811 HPRD — needs 0.70 more hours per resident per day.
⚠️RN staffing (0.3348 HPRD) is below the research-recommended minimum of 0.75 HPRD. This means less clinical oversight per resident.

✨ Strengths (2)

✅No days with zero registered nurse hours this quarter
✅Low agency staff usage (0%) — mostly permanent, familiar staff
Total Nurse HPRD
2.7811hrs/resident/day▼ 1.12
CMS benchmark: 3.48
RN HPRD
0.3348hrs/resident/day▼ 0.35
Recommended: 0.75
Weekend Drop-off
24.64%
2.9892 weekday → 2.2527 weekend
⚠ Significant weekend reduction
Agency Staff
0%
0% of RN hours from contractors
Days with Zero RN
0days this quarter
4+ days = auto 1-star
CNA HPRD
1.4156hrs/resident/day
Direct care aides
LPN HPRD
0.5763hrs/resident/day
Licensed practical nurses
Consistency
0.3762std dev
Lower = more predictable

HPRD Over Time

Total nurse staffing hours per resident per day, by quarter

Total HPRD (shaded area)RN HPRDCMS Benchmark (3.48) — staffing standardResearch Standard (4.10) — recommended level

How Does This Facility Compare?

Compared to county, state, and national averages for total nurse HPRD

vs. Greene County Average-0.91 HPRD
3.69
02.78 HPRD
vs. Missouri State Average-0.70 HPRD
3.48
02.78 HPRD
vs. National Average-1.12 HPRD
3.90
02.78 HPRD
■ Colored bar = this facility · | Black line = average · Based on 2025Q3 data

Nearby Facilities

Compare with other nursing homes in the area

FacilityDistanceGradeTotal HPRDRN HPRDCMS Rating
SPRING VALLEY HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER ★
SPRINGFIELD · This facility
—
D
2.78110.3348★★☆☆☆
COX MEDICAL CENTERS MEYER ORTHOPEDIC AND REHAB
SPRINGFIELD
0.8 mi
A+
10.18058.3333★★★★★
SPRINGFIELD REHABILITATION & HEALTH CARE CENTER
SPRINGFIELD
2 mi
C
3.11120.6367★★★★☆
GLENDALE GARDENS NURSING & REHAB
SPRINGFIELD
2.9 mi
C
3.0760.5578★★★☆☆
WILSON'S CREEK NURSING & REHAB
SPRINGFIELD
5.1 mi
D
2.75310.3302★★★☆☆
SPRINGFIELD SKILLED CARE CENTER
SPRINGFIELD
5.6 mi
D
3.39940.3139★☆☆☆☆

Inspection History & Penalties

Health inspection results from state surveys — most recent first

13
Inspections
85
Total Deficiencies
$0
Fines Assessed
Nov 21, 2025Health
2 deficiencies cited
▼
Aug 25, 2025Health
14 deficiencies cited
▼
Mar 14, 2025Health
1 deficiency cited
▼
Feb 14, 2025Health
1 deficiency cited
▼
Jan 23, 2025Health
2 deficiencies cited
▼
Dec 13, 2024Health
5 deficiencies cited
▼
Apr 9, 2024Health
1 deficiency cited
▼
Jan 24, 2024Health
2 deficiencies cited
▼
Dec 21, 2023Health
17 deficiencies cited
▼
Dec 5, 2023Health
2 deficiencies cited
▼
Feb 15, 2023Health
2 deficiencies cited· Includes actual harm
▼
May 17, 2021Health
13 deficiencies cited· Includes actual harm
▼
May 7, 2019Health
23 deficiencies cited
▼

Penalty History

Dec 13, 2024Payment Denial
CMS Severity Scale
A–C: No Harm / PotentialD–F: No Harm but ConcernG–H: Actual HarmI–L: Immediate Jeopardy

Source: CMS Staffing & Quality Data — 2025Q3 · data.cms.gov

Staffing grades are based on CMS-published thresholds and research recommendations. CMS is not affiliated with and does not endorse this website.