HomeConnecticutSouth Central Ct CountyAPPLE REHAB LAUREL WOODS
D
Poor

APPLE REHAB LAUREL WOODS

451 NORTH HIGH STREET · EAST HAVEN, CT 06512

2034666850 · For profit - Corporation

120 beds110.6 residents170 staff
CMS Five-Star Ratings
Overall
Staffing
Quality
Inspections
Staffing Grades
C
Below Standard
Total Staff
D
Poor
RN Staff
D
Poor
Overall
CMS Benchmark(≥ 3.48 HPRD)
RN Recommendation(≥ 0.75 HPRD)
Research Standard(≥ 4.10 HPRD)
📋

What This Means in Plain English

APPLE REHAB LAUREL WOODS receives an overall staffing grade of D (Poor). With 3.4705 total nurse hours per resident per day, this facility falls below the CMS staffing benchmark of 3.48 HPRD and has RN staffing of 0.3853 HPRD, below the recommended 0.75. It is 0.43 HPRD below the national average.

Weekend staffing stays relatively consistent — dropping 10.54% compared to weekdays. The facility has low agency staff usage (0% of hours), suggesting a mostly permanent workforce.

Staffing levels have remained relatively stable over recent quarters.

🔍 Areas of Concern (2)

🚨Does not meet the CMS staffing benchmark of 3.48 HPRD. Current: 3.4705 HPRD — needs 0.01 more hours per resident per day.
⚠️RN staffing (0.3853 HPRD) is below the research-recommended minimum of 0.75 HPRD. This means less clinical oversight per resident.

Strengths (3)

No days with zero registered nurse hours this quarter
Low agency staff usage (0%) — mostly permanent, familiar staff
Highly consistent day-to-day staffing levels
Total Nurse HPRD
3.4705hrs/resident/day 0.43
CMS benchmark: 3.48
RN HPRD
0.3853hrs/resident/day 0.30
Recommended: 0.75
Weekend Drop-off
10.54%
3.5771 weekday → 3.1999 weekend
Agency Staff
0%
0% of RN hours from contractors
Days with Zero RN
0days this quarter
4+ days = auto 1-star
CNA HPRD
2.0253hrs/resident/day
Direct care aides
LPN HPRD
1.06hrs/resident/day
Licensed practical nurses
Consistency
0.2415std dev
Lower = more predictable

HPRD Over Time

Total nurse staffing hours per resident per day, by quarter

Total HPRD (shaded area)RN HPRDCMS Benchmark (3.48) — staffing standardResearch Standard (4.10) — recommended level

How Does This Facility Compare?

Compared to county, state, and national averages for total nurse HPRD

vs. South Central Ct County Average-0.40 HPRD
3.87
03.47 HPRD
vs. Connecticut State Average-0.37 HPRD
3.84
03.47 HPRD
vs. National Average-0.43 HPRD
3.90
03.47 HPRD
■ Colored bar = this facility · | Black line = average · Based on 2025Q3 data

Nearby Facilities

Compare with other nursing homes in the area

FacilityDistanceGradeTotal HPRDRN HPRDCMS Rating
APPLE REHAB LAUREL WOODS
EAST HAVEN · This facility
D
3.47050.3853☆☆☆☆
NEW HAVEN CENTER FOR NURSING & REHABILITATION LLC
NEW HAVEN
1.3 mi
B
3.78090.6532☆☆☆☆
MARY WADE HOME, THE INCORPORATED
NEW HAVEN
1.9 mi
C
4.09560.4668☆☆☆☆
WHISPERING PINES REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER
EAST HAVEN
2 mi
C
3.85090.4323★★★★
ARK HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION AT BRANFORD HILLS
BRANFORD
2.2 mi
B
3.57750.7399★★★☆☆
Leeway, Inc
NEW HAVEN
2.8 mi
A
4.31041.4433★★★★★

Inspection History & Penalties

Health inspection results from state surveys — most recent first

15
Inspections
45
Total Deficiencies
$82,047
Fines Assessed
Apr 30, 2025Health
1 deficiency cited
Apr 11, 2025Health
3 deficiencies cited
Mar 26, 2025Health
2 deficiencies cited
Dec 13, 2024Health
1 deficiency cited
Sep 4, 2024Health
1 deficiency cited
May 31, 2024Health
3 deficiencies cited· Includes actual harm
Mar 14, 2024Health
18 deficiencies cited· Includes actual harm
Oct 31, 2023Health
1 deficiency cited
Sep 29, 2023Health
1 deficiency cited
Aug 17, 2023Health
1 deficiency cited
May 10, 2023Health
1 deficiency cited· Includes actual harm
Apr 4, 2023Health
2 deficiencies cited
Mar 8, 2023Health
4 deficiencies cited
Jan 9, 2020Health
5 deficiencies cited
Nov 8, 2018Health
1 deficiency cited

Penalty History

May 31, 2024Fine
$8,021
Mar 14, 2024Fine
$56,534
Apr 4, 2023Fine
$17,492
CMS Severity Scale
A–C: No Harm / PotentialD–F: No Harm but ConcernG–H: Actual HarmI–L: Immediate Jeopardy

Source: CMS Staffing & Quality Data — 2025Q3 · data.cms.gov

Staffing grades are based on CMS-published thresholds and research recommendations. CMS is not affiliated with and does not endorse this website.