HomeCaliforniaLos Angeles CountyMONTEBELLO CARE CENTER
D
Poor

MONTEBELLO CARE CENTER

1035 W BEVERLY BLVD · MONTEBELLO, CA 90640

3237241315 · For profit - Limited Liability company

99 beds93 residents126 staff
CMS Five-Star Ratings
Overall
Staffing
Quality
Inspections
Staffing Grades
B
Good
Total Staff
D
Poor
RN Staff
D
Poor
Overall
CMS Benchmark(≥ 3.48 HPRD)
RN Recommendation(≥ 0.75 HPRD)
Research Standard(≥ 4.10 HPRD)
📋

What This Means in Plain English

MONTEBELLO CARE CENTER receives an overall staffing grade of D (Poor). With 3.7862 total nurse hours per resident per day, this facility meets the CMS staffing benchmark and has RN staffing of 0.3301 HPRD, below the recommended 0.75. It is 0.11 HPRD below the national average.

Weekend staffing stays relatively consistent — dropping 9.28% compared to weekdays. The facility has low agency staff usage (0% of hours), suggesting a mostly permanent workforce.

Staffing levels have remained relatively stable over recent quarters.

🔍 Areas of Concern (1)

⚠️RN staffing (0.3301 HPRD) is below the research-recommended minimum of 0.75 HPRD. This means less clinical oversight per resident.

Strengths (5)

Meets the CMS staffing benchmark (≥ 3.48 HPRD)
No days with zero registered nurse hours this quarter
Low agency staff usage (0%) — mostly permanent, familiar staff
Consistent weekend staffing — only 9.28% drop-off
Highly consistent day-to-day staffing levels
Total Nurse HPRD
3.7862hrs/resident/day 0.11
CMS benchmark: 3.48
RN HPRD
0.3301hrs/resident/day 0.35
Recommended: 0.75
Weekend Drop-off
9.28%
3.8881 weekday → 3.5274 weekend
Agency Staff
0%
0% of RN hours from contractors
Days with Zero RN
0days this quarter
4+ days = auto 1-star
CNA HPRD
2.3443hrs/resident/day
Direct care aides
LPN HPRD
1.1118hrs/resident/day
Licensed practical nurses
Consistency
0.1964std dev
Lower = more predictable

HPRD Over Time

Total nurse staffing hours per resident per day, by quarter

Total HPRD (shaded area)RN HPRDCMS Benchmark (3.48) — staffing standardResearch Standard (4.10) — recommended level

How Does This Facility Compare?

Compared to county, state, and national averages for total nurse HPRD

vs. Los Angeles County Average-0.77 HPRD
4.56
03.79 HPRD
vs. California State Average-0.73 HPRD
4.52
03.79 HPRD
vs. National Average-0.11 HPRD
3.90
03.79 HPRD
■ Colored bar = this facility · | Black line = average · Based on 2025Q3 data

Nearby Facilities

Compare with other nursing homes in the area

FacilityDistanceGradeTotal HPRDRN HPRDCMS Rating
MONTEBELLO CARE CENTER
MONTEBELLO · This facility
D
3.78620.3301☆☆☆☆
PICO RIVERA HEALTHCARE CENTER
PICO RIVERA
2.2 mi
D
3.8410.267★★★☆☆
SAN GABRIEL CONV CENTER
ROSEMEAD
2.2 mi
B
4.95390.6996★★☆☆☆
MONTEREY PARK CONV HOSP
MONTEREY PARK
3.4 mi
D
4.15170.3804★★★★
SOCAL POST-ACUTE CARE
WHITTIER
3.5 mi
D
4.1460.3415★★★★
RIVIERA HEALTHCARE CENTER
PICO RIVERA
3.6 mi
D
4.05180.3959★★☆☆☆

Inspection History & Penalties

Health inspection results from state surveys — most recent first

18
Inspections
67
Total Deficiencies
$28,592
Fines Assessed
Jul 18, 2025Health
2 deficiencies cited
Jun 27, 2025Health
1 deficiency cited
May 16, 2025Health
2 deficiencies cited
Apr 22, 2025Health
1 deficiency cited
Apr 4, 2025Health
16 deficiencies cited
Aug 30, 2024Health
1 deficiency cited
Aug 1, 2024Health
1 deficiency cited
May 15, 2024Health
1 deficiency cited
Apr 25, 2024Health
19 deficiencies cited
Sep 8, 2023Health
1 deficiency cited
Aug 30, 2023Health
1 deficiency cited
Aug 29, 2023Health
1 deficiency cited
Aug 16, 2023Health
1 deficiency cited
Jun 23, 2023Health
2 deficiencies cited
May 29, 2023Health
2 deficiencies cited· Includes actual harm
May 2, 2023Health
1 deficiency cited
Mar 24, 2023Health
13 deficiencies cited
Mar 1, 2023Health
1 deficiency cited· Includes actual harm

Penalty History

May 29, 2023Fine
$28,592
CMS Severity Scale
A–C: No Harm / PotentialD–F: No Harm but ConcernG–H: Actual HarmI–L: Immediate Jeopardy

Source: CMS Staffing & Quality Data — 2025Q3 · data.cms.gov

Staffing grades are based on CMS-published thresholds and research recommendations. CMS is not affiliated with and does not endorse this website.